Does Big Government Need to Help Us Do Everything
California, Missouri
The 11/01/23 California Democrat article on updating California’s
wastewater plant was interesting. The article mentions that the city has
received a $20 million grant from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources;
I suspect that a substantial portion of that money was funded by the $2
trillion dollar 2023 federal deficit, more debt and higher interest payments
piled on the shoulders of all future generations.
I live in rural Cole County, why are my tax dollars funding
improvements to the California water and sewer systems? If I built a home in a
rural area I would be expected to pay the cost of installing and maintaining my
utilities; water, sewer, electricity, etc. Should several households choose to
band together and build, as part of a homeowners association, part of their
investment would fund providing
utilities for the group of homes. Supposedly there would be some “economies of
scale”; the cost of utilities allocated to each homeowner would be less than it
would for a single homeowner.
If my well or septic system goes bad I would not expect the
federal government to force others to subsidize repairs. If new applicants want
to join a homeowners association, requiring expansion of existing utilities,
the new residents would be expected bear the cost of the needed improvements. Why
can’t those who are serviced by the California water and wastewater systems pay
to operate them? Would it have been less expensive for each California
household if each of them furnished and maintained their own, individual water
and sewer systems?
What is wrong with us, as individuals or communities paying
our own way? The other alternative is that we allow Sugar Daddy big government
to subsidize our wants/needs and fund those subsidies by piling more debt, and
massive annual interest payments on all future generations.
It is not my intention to single out California; this is
just one example of runaway government intrusion. Rather than expecting people
and communities to be responsible and provide for themselves, Sugar Daddy
politicians are always there to buy votes by piling more debt on future
generations.
While Bidenomics did decrease federal receipts by $500
billion from 2022 to 2023 they were still the 2nd highest amount of
taxes ever extracted from our economy, and we still had a $1.7 trillion
deficit.
Comments
Post a Comment